Posts Tagged ‘prius’

Toyota Prius production in the U.S. could be delayed until 2011… or not - Autoblog

Sunday, November 16th, 2008
Toyota Prius production in the U.S. could be delayed until 2011… or not - Autoblog

Toyota Prius production in the U.S. could be delayed until 2011… or not

Toyota has been scrambling to right its financial ship after cutting its profit forecast by 63% in the face of dismal US auto sales. The Japanese automaker set up an emergency committee to look at areas to cut costs, and all programs are said to be on the table. Though Toyota has announced nothing specific to this point, Japan’s Nikkei Business Daily is announcing that the first US-built Priuses may not be produced until 2011. That would mean a one year delay of the opening of Toyota’s Mississippi plant, which has already seen a product shift and cost overruns. The new 2010 Prius, which will initially only be built in Japan until the Mississippi plant comes online, is scheduled to be unveiled at the Detroit Auto Show in January.

Read the entire article at Toyota Prius production in the U.S. could be delayed until 2011… or not - Autoblog

Angry looking cars, really angry drivers | Detroit Free Press

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008
Angry looking cars, really angry drivers | Freep.com | Detroit Free Press BY MATT HELMS

Here’s another indication that our automotive world is an aggressive, surly place.

We speed and weave, honk the horn, flip the bird and heaven help the driver who tries to squeeze into the lane in front of us. Yo, that’s my space, you jerk!

Apparently, we favor cars that project the same sensibility.

There are a lot of cars on the road that don’t look menacing, but a new report says people prefer bad-boy vehicles to Mr. Nice Guy. That’s according to a LiveScience.com report about a study from the University of Vienna.

Good and strong: The BMW 5 Series. Weakly and not so appealing: The Toyota Prius.

The Detroit 3 certainly put out their share of vehicles with tough-guy styling. The Pontiac G8 isn’t out to make friendly. The Chevy Impala doesn’t look pleased. The Dodge Charger practically sneers at the road.

Even the little Ford Focus glares at you.

The idea that people can see facial features in the fronts of vehicles isn’t new. The headlights are eyes. The grille is the mouth.

I remember telling my mom when I was a kid that it looked like some cars were smiling.

Now, it’s all about the scowl.

Read the entire article at Angry looking cars, really angry drivers | Freep.com | Detroit Free Press.

The Volt Isn’t A Prius. It Might Even Be Better | Wired.com

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008
The Volt Isn’t A Prius. It Might Even Be Better | Autopia from Wired.com By Chuck Squatriglia

The Chevrolet Volt and Toyota Prius look a lot alike, but they are fundamentally different cars that blaze separate paths toward the inevitable electrification of the automobile. And while the Prius is the world’s most-popular hybrid and the poster child for green(er) motoring, the Volt is more technologically advanced. 

The Prius, like the Honda Civic Hybrid and the forthcoming Insight, is a parallel hybrid that uses both an electric motor and a gasoline engine to drive the wheels. It is designed to deliver optimal fuel economy at low speed or in stop-and-go traffic, when the electric motor does all the work. At highway speeds, it’s just another fossil-fuel burner, albeit one that gets 45 mpg and emits less CO2 than almost anything else on the road.

The Volt, which General Motors finally unveiled Tuesday, is a series hybrid, also called a range-extended electric vehicle. Like the Prius, it’s got an electric motor and a gasoline engine, but the engine merely charges the battery as it approaches depletion. Electricity alone turns the 17-inch wheels. The Volt is designed to travel 40 miles on a single charge of its lithium-ion battery, meaning most drivers will never burn a drop of gasoline.
Assuming it works, of course.   

GM is confident it will, and it’s given 700 people — many of them veterans of the groundbreaking EV1 electric car GM unceremoniously killed in 1994 2003 — a blank check to make sure the Volt is in showrooms by the end of 2010. The company reportedly will spend $400 to $500 million on the project during the next two years. “We can do anything we want to make this happen,” Andrew Farah, the Volt’s chief engineer and a veteran of the EV1, tells us. Many industry analysts and battery experts say it’ll be close, but GM almost certainly will meet that deadline.

“GM is staking its reputation on the Volt working and it’s spent a lot of money to make sure it will work,” says Mike Omotoso of JD Power & Associates. “I think they’ll be able to mass produce them by 2010.”

The heart of the car is a T-shaped 16-kilowatt-hour battery comprised of 220 lithium-ion cells and a 111-kilowatt (150-horsepower) electric motor good for a top speed of 100 mph. GM says the drivetrain will produce acceleration similar to that of a V-6 engine. The goal is to get the battery down to 396 pounds and no more than 64-inches long and 33 1/2-inches wide across the top of the “T.” That’s light-years ahead of the similarly shaped lead-acid battery that powered the earliest EV1s; it weighed 1,200 pounds and was 92.5-inches long. The Volt’s battery will run the length of the cabin, taking up the space beneath the center console and the rear seat.

GM is testing batteries around-the-clock at labs in Michigan and Detroit, where engineers have as many as 40 battery packs on test rigs that measure life-cycle depletion rates, thermal behavior and load performance. “Extreme cold temperature and battery life are the biggest challenges,” Denise Gray, director of advanced battery technology, says. The objective is to build a battery that works as well in Nome, Alaska or Flagstaff, Arizona as it does in the lab — and is good for 150,000 miles. “It’s a high hurdle to clear,” Gray concedes. “Maximum” Bob Lutz, VP of global development for GM and the guy cracking the whip to keep the Volt on schedule, says the batteries are performing “flawlessly” and “it’s almost scary that we aren’t seeing any problems with them.”

GM is testing batteries from LG Chem/Compact Power and A123 Systems/Continental, and Lutz says the company’s decided who’ll get the contract but won’t announce it until the end of the year.

General Motors wants the Volt to recharge in eight hours using a standard 120-volt wall outlet or three hours with a 240. Of course, that won’t do you any good if you’re miles from home when the batteries are winding down. At that point, the Volt’s 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine kicks on, powering a 53-kilowatt generator that will keep the battery going. The original plan called for a 1-liter three-cylinder turbocharged engine, but GM went with the four because it’s lighter and simpler. “To be honest with you, we’ve got enough technology in the Volt,” says Micky Bly, director of hybrid drivetrain engineering. “We don’t need the added complexity of a turbocharger.”

Bly says the engine will produce less than 100 kilowatts (134 horsepower) but promises that’s enough to do the job. And because the engine drives a generator that will run at a constant speed, the power band can be optimized for maximum fuel efficiency and lowest emissions. “We can run it in the sweet spot at all times,” he says. Just how sweet that spot is remains to be seen, because GM isn’t saying what kind of fuel economy or emissions we’ll see from the Volt, although 50 mpg has been mentioned.

The engine will not fully charge the battery. Instead, it will keep the battery in what Farah calls “charge sustaining mode” at about 30 percent of its capacity, providing enough juice to keep the car going. The idea, like so much of the technology in the Volt, was born of the EV1. Engineers testing the EV1 in the early 1990s needed a way to keep its battery charged as they racked up miles on the track. They fashioned a generator from a snowmobile engine strapped to a trailer towed behind the car. Farah thought it was a great way to improve the EV1’s range, and some of the engineers urged GM to incorporate it into the car.

If it had, what was the EV1 might have been the Volt.

Read the entire article at The Volt Isn’t A Prius. It Might Even Be Better | Autopia from Wired.com.

First HUMMER, now Prius: Hybrids targeted by vandals, too

Monday, September 8th, 2008

As much as I hate Prius drivers, NO ONE deserves to have their car trashed. Talk trash all you want. Argue the points. Call them names, even, But don’t touch any one’s car.

First HUMMER, now Prius: Hybrids targeted by vandals, too

7BAF3351-66EB-43DE-9442-DAF8C2F60274.jpgVandals who mess with other people’s cars are scum — bottom-feeders who are beneath contempt. It doesn’t matter what the vehicle being damaged is. Cars are a major purchase, there’s often an emotional connection to them, and most importantly, they generally represent the owner’s primary source of mobility — getting him or her to work, to the store, to pick up the kids, and so on.

SUV owners know the deal, and it sucks. Stories of drivers (and dealers) finding trucks partially or completely trashed in the name of saving Mother Earth are nothing new, and now it seems that Prius owners are getting their own taste of this nonsense. Inside Line reports that a recent Los Angeles case in which one of the Toyotas was burned to the ground has been determined to be the result of arson. In Petaluma, CA, meanwhile, seven Priuses were vandalized over a two-week period in April. One poor woman had her car attacked twice, and then when it was in for repairs, the Prius rental she had also got worked over. The conventional wisdom suggests that the Prius is a juicy target because it’s a poster child for the environmental movement. And seriously, is this at all surprising? Some sort of anti-eco blowback like this was probably inevitable. People get fed up, so just as the HUMMER and other SUVs are targeted by greens looking to send a message, it was only a matter of time before the anti-HUMMER started getting the same kind of attention from the other direction.

What’s it all prove? Nothing, except that asshats are readily found on both sides of every issue. If you don’t like a particular car or truck, feel free to talk as much trash as you want (it’s practically a sport in the comments section around here). Think the HUMMER represents some sort of rolling apocalypse? Fine. Ditto if you feel that the Prius is nothing but a snob capsule for tree huggers. Just don’t turn those thoughts in to actions, because when you willfully screw with another person’s car or truck, you’re just another stupid criminal, and whatever message you think you’re advancing just falls on deaf (and angry) ears.

Sources: Inside Line, Prius Owners Group]

Read the entire article at Autoblog First HUMMER, now Prius: Hybrids targeted by vandals, too.

Toyota Prius: Swedes Do $184,000 Worth Of Unholy Things To Toyota Prius

Friday, August 22nd, 2008

Toyota Prius: Swedes Do $184,000 Worth Of Unholy Things To Toyota Prius

Swedish Prius

Given the mission of the Toyota Prius, not to mention its technical complexity, it’s not a huge surprise there isn’t a lot of tuner work being done on the Toyota hybrid. Oh sure, there are a couple customized Prii floating around, but this example from Sweden totally blows out anything ever done before. According to tuner Classe’s Garage, the only thing unchanged is the chrome grille trim. The build took eight weeks and $184,275. Are they effing serious?! Sure the paint is off the charts, the interior has more doo-dads and gadgets than a space shuttle, and its got crazy body mods, but holy crap! Check out the video of this obscene Prius below while we try to catch our breath.


Extreme Toyota Prius

Read the entire article at Toyota Prius: Swedes Do $184,000 Worth Of Unholy Things To Toyota Prius.

Daily Freeman - For Prius owner, ethanol is a pain in the gas

Sunday, August 10th, 2008
Daily Freeman - For Prius owner, ethanol is a pain in the gas By Kyle Wind, Freeman staff

AS EXPENSIVE as driving is these days, Michele Linehan decided to drive all the way from her Rosendale home to Shokan just to fill up her gas tank - because she hopes the trip will save her some money in the long run.

The reason for the trip was to see what the impact of driving with ethanol-free gasoline would be on her car’s fuel consumption. Dependable Energy, on state Route 28 in Shokan, is the only station in the area where she can fill up with ethanol-free gas.

Last May, Linehan - a Will Care nurse who spends much of her days driving to and from patients’ homes - decided to trade in her 2003 Toyota Matrix and get a new, $23,000 Toyota Prius at the Prestige dealership in the town of Ulster.

Her plan was to reduce her fuel consumption. But now she feels “ripped off,” she says.

Through the summer of 2007, Linehan said she averaged around 55 miles per gallon, but when she calculated her car’s fuel economy this year, she found her vehicle was burning about a gallon of gasoline for every 45 miles she traveled.

At its best last year, the car, a gas-electric hybrid, achieved nearly 60 miles for each gallon of gas it burned, Linehan said. At its worst this year: 38 miles per gallon.

Linehan called both the dealership and Toyota’s headquarters seeking answers, and the conclusion she drew from the conversations was that the increased use of ethanol in gasoline has hurt her car’s fuel economy.

“Burning ethanol produces fewer BTUs (British thermal units) than gasoline. It has less energy,” said Toyota Spokesman Bill Kwong. However, as a Prius owner himself, Kwong expressed surprise at the numbers Linehan offered.

Kwong said his Prius has always averaged 46 to 48 miles per gallon and that a decline as steep as the one described by Linehan could not be explained by ethanol use alone.

Patrick Bolton, a senior project manager for the New York State Energy Development Research Authority (NYSERDA), agreed.

With gasoline containing 10 percent ethanol, “there should be no more than a 3 percent penalty in fuel economy,” said Bolton, who specializes in alternative fuels and vehicle programs.

Nonetheless, Linehan says her car was able to drive five more miles on each gallon of gas after she bought ethanol-free gasoline twice at Dependable Energy.

In New York state, about half of the commercial gasoline is made up of anywhere from 5 to 10 percent ethanol, according to Bolton.

“It will eventually all be E-10,” he predicted, noting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency capped ethanol content in gasoline at 10 percent because non-”flex fuel” vehicles tend to experience problems like stalling, stuttering and “check engine” lights coming on when they consume fuel with too much ethanol.

The increased use of ethanol in gas has been fueled, in part, by increasing federal renewal fuel standards, Bolton said. Specifically, while the country’s target for this year was to consume 7.8 billion gallons of renewable fuels, Congress has set a goal of 36 billion gallons by 2022.

Regulation is only part of the picture, though, Bolton said, because Americans are on pace to consume 9.1 billion gallons of renewable fuels this year - the reason being that gas retailers have been able to lower their prices by 10 to 15 cents per gallon by adding ethanol.

Bolton said the E-85 blend for “flex fuel” vehicles retails for a national average of about $3.10 per gallon, compared to regular unleaded gasoline’s average of around $4. Even though, “there will be a higher fuel economy penalty” of 15 to 20 percent for 85 percent ethanol compared to a 3 percent penalty at 10 percent, Bolton said. But because it’s 25 percent less expensive, “you still come out ahead.”

Bolton said New York state has between 20 and 25 stations that sell E-85, and 80 another have filed applications with NYSERDA to sell it. Bolton believes E-85 not only is cost-effective, but good for New York’s economy because the state is home to two major ethanol refineries that buy corn stock from local farmers.

Meanwhile, some tips Kwong offered to increase fuel economy included driving more conservatively, carrying less weight and staying diligent about vehicle upkeep. He specifically pointed to maintaining the appropriate tire pressure.

Linehan said her Prius is “up to date on maintenance.”

Read the entire article at Daily Freeman - For Prius owner, ethanol is a pain in the gas.

One dead after Prius crashes into truck near San Mateo Bridge - San Jose Mercury News

Sunday, August 10th, 2008
One dead after Prius crashes into truck near San Mateo Bridge - San Jose Mercury News

One person died after crashing into an unoccupied electrician truck in a parking lot near the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge this morning, according to the California Highway Patrol.

The crash was reported just after 6:30 a.m. near the toll plaza of the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge, also known as state Highway 92, CHP Officer Aaron Quistad said.

A preliminary investigation indicates the victim crashed a Toyota Prius into the parked electrician truck, according to Quistad. The Prius sustained major front-end damage.

The victim was pronounced dead at the scene. No other injuries were reported, Quistad said.

Read the entire article at One dead after Prius crashes into truck near San Mateo Bridge - San Jose Mercury News.

Eat my shorts, you pious hybrids

Saturday, August 9th, 2008
Eat my shorts, you pious hybrids Ben Laurance

It is always heartening to have one’s prejudices vindicated. You harbour an intense dislike of something, then, joy of joys, some academic from the University of Chorlton-cum-Hardy produces a piece of research that shows your loathing actually has some justification. This is the told-you-so moment.

Example: you’ve always hated broad beans? Then someone, somewhere has probably established that eating too many broad beans causes foot-rot. And you’re driven mad by the incessant cacophony of beeps from supermarket scanners? A study by a group of scientists looking for a research grant finds that if you’re subjected to it for 12 hours on the trot, you’re more likely to contract chlamydia.

So it was when we heard a few weeks ago that many “greener” cars aren’t nearly as green as they would like us to believe. Tests showed that several cars claiming admirably low carbon dioxide emissions were in fact pumping out far more of the gas than the manufacturers said.

My heart leapt when I read this. I have absolutely nothing against low-emission cars. anything produces the better. But I am suspicious of the people who drive hybrids and other vehicles that are ostentatiously “green”. A Prius is for the pious. And as we have now discovered, many hybrid cars aren’t nearly as environmentally friendly as we thought.

Which brings me to bicycles. To drive your children to school in a hybrid car is not a green thing to do - even if it impresses some of the other parents. But cycle to school with them? That really will cut your carbon footprint.

Look at a few numbers. A big, flashy hybrid car might manage 30 or perhaps 40 miles to the gallon. The smallest, most lightweight, ultra-economical diesel hatchback could, at a pinch, top 70mpg.

Now, of course cycling uses up energy. Cyclists burn calories. But with a bike, most of the effort goes into pushing along the rider. With cars, most of the energy consumed is used to propel the car itself rather than the people sitting in it. A car is a heavy thing. People are relatively light. And a bike weighs perhaps a couple of stone - little more than a big bag of shopping.

The net result? Take the calories from burning a gallon of petrol. Feed those calories to a cyclist in the form of food. That should be enough to keep him or her going for around 1,500 miles. In other words, the cyclist does 1,500 miles to the gallon. If there were a pleasant, shaded bike path running along the equator, the cyclist could circumnavigate the Earth on the equivalent of less than 17 gallons of fuel.

Thirsty work, certainly, but with a low environmental impact.

None of which is to say that people - myself included - should stop using a car. But for those 70% of car trips that are less than five miles, a bike is a sensible - and profoundly green - alternative.

Even if it means your environmental credentials aren’t on show, parked in the driveway.

Read the entire article at Eat my shorts, you pious hybrids.

Ecosexuals do it greener

Thursday, August 7th, 2008
Ecosexuals do it greener / Violet Blue shows how to have hot eco-friendly sex by Violet Blue

Note: Several of the links in this article contain lead to sites containing images of semi-realistic sex toys. Use caution and good sense if clicking from a common area.

Bouncing around Nob Hill in an old Honda full of fleshy jiggly local exotic dancers, we were talking about boys and cars. From behind the wheel, Pepper suddenly tells us, “I’m thinking I should get a Prius.”

You could practically hear the tires screech to a halt in the lurid boys-sex-cars chatter. After a long moment of consideration, Brandy cattily remarks from next to me, “So not hot.” Pepper retorts, “What the hell do you mean? A Prius would be the right thing to do, plus it would make me look hot to all those eco-bitches who want to get it on with someone who cares about the environment.” At which point, I asked the fatal question to the entire car: “Does a Prius make a guy hot, or not? Would you date a guy who drives a Prius — or a hot sports car?”

Read the entire article at Ecosexuals do it greener / Violet Blue shows how to have hot eco-friendly sex.

Prius Soon will Offer V8 Roar - U.S. News Rankings and Reviews

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008
Prius Soon will Offer V8 Roar - U.S. News Rankings and Reviews

Edmunds Inside Line reports, “Hybrid and electric vehicles, such as the Toyota Prius and the Tesla Roadster, may pose a deadly threat to people who rely on their hearing to cross streets, critics such as the National Federation for the Blind have charged. On Tuesday, Lotus Engineering introduced what may become a relatively inexpensive solution to the problem with its ‘Safe & Sound Hybrid.’”  The system, which Lotus says costs about as much as a conventional car stereo, projects the sound of a conventional engine “through waterproof speakers mounted at the front of the vehicle.” 

CNET explains, “Because it’s just a speaker, Lotus can make any sound they want, but they’ve stuck to using an existing engine sound that makes the vehicle instantly recognizable, with the pitch and frequency helping to identify its distance and speed.”  The system can be configured to make constant noise for all-electric vehicles, or to switch off when the actual gasoline engine of a hybrid car ignites.

Because the sound is projected forward, it can’t be heard once the car has passed.  Lotus says it is also virtually silent to those inside the cabin. 

PaulTan.Org has video of Lotus engineers testing the system on a Prius.

A similar technology is almost inevitable on future versions of the Prius and other hybrids.  The federal government is reportedly considering regulations that would require the vehicles to make more noise.   

Read the entire article at Prius Soon will Offer V8 Roar - U.S. News Rankings and Reviews.