Archive for May, 2008

Hybrids: The High Cost of Low Batteries | Newsweek Voices - Keith Naughton | Newsweek.com

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008
Hybrids: The High Cost of Low Batteries | Newsweek Voices - Keith Naughton | Newsweek.com

Assaulted Batteries

Hybrids are hot, but some drivers are concerned about the high cost of replacing that gas-saving battery.

As I got into my car at my local YMCA recently, I noticed a Prius parked next to me with a For Sale sign in the window. It read: “‘05 Prius, $14,999, 97,000 miles.” This beige Prius looked to be in good condition. And with gas prices topping $4 a gallon, it certainly seemed like a good deal for a gas-electric hybrid that gets 48 mpg in the city and would cost about $23,000 new. But one question nagged at me: as the odometer approaches the century mark, how much life is left in this car’s electric battery? And then an even scarier question occurred to me: if the battery runs out of juice, how much would it cost to replace it? Those concerns short-circuited any interest I had. So I put the key in the ignition of my far less fuel-efficient car and drove off.

Hybrids these days are hotter than a laptop battery, with sales up 58 percent last month. But what happens if the battery on your hybrid goes dead? After all, hybrids have been on the road in America for eight years, racking up hundreds of thousands of miles. Automakers say those big batteries under the seats are holding up well. But when they power down, replacing them will cost you thousands. That thought might have been a caution light for me, but it isn’t for the growing gridlock of used hybrid buyers. On the car Web site MyRide.com, the number one search term last month was “Used Toyota Prius”—up 944 percent since January. “People are ignoring the concern about battery life,” says J.D. Power auto analyst Michael Omotoso. “Their immediate concern is, ‘Oh my God, gas is $4 a gallon. I need a hybrid. I’ll worry about battery replacement five years down the road.’”

When hybrids first hit the road in 2000, there was plenty of fear-mongering, especially here in Detroit, where the Big Three were drunk on cheap gas and big SUV sales. Back then Motown execs warned darkly that rescue workers could be electrocuted trying to save trapped motorists who crashed in these high-voltage contraptions. And those giant batteries could cost $10,000 or $15,000 to replace once they ran down, maybe after 100,000 miles or less.

It turns out those safety fears were nonsense. But while the battery replacement cost was overblown, it is not insignificant. Philip Card of Utica, N.Y., says a Toyota dealer wanted to charge him $3,900 to replace the battery on his 2001 Prius, which had 350,000 miles on it when he bought it used on eBay this year for $4,357. Card knew the battery might be running on empty when he bought the car, but the retired engineer hoped to convert the car into a plug-in hybrid that could get 100 mpg. Before he had a chance, though, his Prius had a brownout. “It lost power drastically,” he says. “It still moves around, but with no pep at all.” He’s decided to park the Prius rather than replace the battery. He’s going to scavenge parts from it to fix up two other Priuses he owns. What’s his advice for other used Prius buyers? “If they’re going to take it to a Toyota dealer for service,” he says, “they better have deep pockets.”

The stiff cost of replacing a battery at your dealer helps explain why an underground aftermarket in Prius batteries is emerging. Since last year eBay has seen an 850 percent increase in Prius batteries changing hands. Prices for used Prius batteries—which come from junkyards and auto body shops—range from $450 to $1,700, says Famous Rhodes, director of eBay Motors parts and accessories. “As hybrid vehicles hit the tipping point in age,” he says, “the demand is growing significantly.”

The hard part about these cheap batteries: once you buy them you have to figure out how to install them. That’s labor-intensive work for which dealers can charge $900. But Rhodes does not recommend that amateur mechanics try to tackle this high-voltage repair job. “This is not something where a DIY can just open up an installation manual and put in their own batteries,” says Rhodes. “You need to have a mechanic or an electrical technician do it.”

Despite eBay’s booming battery bazaar, Toyota, Honda and Ford all say hybrid battery failures are extremely rare. Out of more than 100,000 Honda hybrids on the road, the automaker says fewer than 200 have had a battery fail after the warranty expired. Honda, like Toyota and Ford, covers the cost of battery replacement for the first 100,000 miles in most states and 150,000 miles in California and a few other states with tough green car laws.

Toyota says its out-of-warranty battery replacement rate is 0.003 percent on the second generation Prius that debuted in the 2004 model year. That equals about one out of 40,000 Priuses sold, says Toyota spokesman John Hanson. That’s a vast improvement over the first generation Prius, which had about 1 percent of the batteries fail after the warranty expired. Hanson says today’s Prius batteries are designed to last “the life of the car,” which Toyota defines as 180,000 miles. (Toyota and Panasonic announced Friday that they will build a new $200 million factory to produce more hybrid batteries to meet the automaker’s goal of selling 1 million gas-electric cars a year.)

For those unlucky few who have to replace their own batteries, the cost is coming down. On June 1 Honda is slashing the cost of its batteries from $3,400 (excluding installation) to as low as $1,968 on an Insight or as high as $2,440 on an Accord hybrid. Toyota also plans to substantially cut battery prices, which now stand at $3,000 (excluding installation), down from $5,500 on the original Prius. Both automakers attribute the price cuts to improved technology and lower production costs. But some analysts think Toyota and Honda are really trying to get ahead of consumer concerns about battery replacement. “PR is a very important factor in the hybrid market,” says J.D. Power’s Omotoso. “Honda and Toyota have the oldest hybrids on the road. And when a hybrid gets to be that old, you have to factor battery replacement costs into your purchase decision.”

So far, the high cost of battery replacement isn’t having much impact on the resale value of hybrids. The Automotive Lease Guide (ALG)—the resale value bible—only recently began assessing hybrids. “We had concerns about battery life,” says ALG CEO John Blair. “But our analysts told us that battery life was really a nonissue. They found that the batteries have a 10-year life expectancy, which is quite reasonable.”

Still, hybrids don’t hold their value as well as their gasoline-powered siblings, batteries aside. For example, a three-year-old Honda Civic is worth about $12,000, retaining about 60 percent of its original sticker price of $20,000, according to Blair. But a hybrid Honda Civic holds only 58 percent of its original sticker price after three years, giving it a used price of $13,630, down from a new price of $23,500. “The new car buyer is more into bells and whistles, while used car buyers are all about value,” says Blair. “If a hybrid is near the end of its warranty, what could creep into the mind of the used car buyer is, ‘I still have a doubt about the battery, and it’s just one more big thing that could go wrong.’”

Anytime you buy a used car, there’s always a risk that something big and costly could wear out. That’s why the experts recommend having your mechanic check out any used car you’re thinking about buying. The problem is there aren’t that many mechanics who know how to tell if a hybrid battery is running out of juice. “We’re on the front edge of figuring out how this all plays out,” says Rob Chesney, vice president of eBay Motors. “As a hybrid owner, you’re kind of playing a game of Russian roulette.” Precisely why I was happy to drive away from that seemingly good deal at the Y.

Read the entire article at Hybrids: The High Cost of Low Batteries | Newsweek Voices - Keith Naughton | Newsweek.com.

Michelle Rodriguez Photos & Pics | Michelle Rodriguez Has Your Behind On Her Mind

Monday, May 26th, 2008
Michelle Rodriguez Photos & Pics | Michelle Rodriguez Has Your Behind On Her Mind

Like most hybrid-car owners, Michelle Rodriguez is full of good things to say about her car - but as she let us know yesterday, they might not be as eco-friendly as they promise!

The Lost actress paused outside the Coffee Bean yesterday to speak up on the subject of all the things they don’t tell you about Prius ownership - like the possibility that the battery might give you cancer! “Imagine your cell phone - like, a hundred times the voltage - going right up ya’ ass”, Michelle remarked to our cameraman. Yikes - good point, Michelle!

Read the entire article at Michelle Rodriguez Photos & Pics | Michelle Rodriguez Has Your Behind On Her Mind.

Don’t Buy That New Prius! Test-Drive a Used Car Instead

Sunday, May 25th, 2008
Don’t Buy That New Prius! Test-Drive a Used Car Instead By Matt Power

INCONVENIENT TRUTHS: Get Ready to Rethink What it Means to Be Green
1: Live in Cities
2: A/C Is OK
3: Organics Are Not The Answer
4: Farm the Forests
5: China Is the Solution
6: Accept Genetic Engineering
7: Carbon Trading Doesn’t Work
8: Embrace Nuclear Power
9: Used Cars — Not Hybrids
10: Prepare for the Worst

IT’S NOT JUST CARBON, STUPID: Dangers of Focusing Solely on Climate Change

AUTOPIA: Go Green — Buy A Used Car. It’s Better Than A Hybrid.

In 2006, an Oregon market research firm released an incendiary 500-page report. Its claim: A Humvee (13 miles per gallon city, 16 highway) uses less energy than a Prius (48 city, 45 highway). Scientists quickly debunked the study, but the Hummer lovers got one thing right. Pound for pound, making a Prius contributes more carbon to the atmosphere than making a Hummer, largely due to the environmental cost of the 30 pounds of nickel in the hybrid’s battery. Of course, the hybrid quickly erases that carbon deficit on the road, thanks to its vastly superior fuel economy.

Still, the comparison suggests a more sensible question. If a new Prius were placed head-to-head with a used car, would the Prius win? Don’t bet on it. Making a Prius consumes 113 million BTUs, according to sustainability engineer Pablo Päster. A single gallon of gas contains about 113,000 Btus, so Toyota’s green wonder guzzles the equivalent of 1,000 gallons before it clocks its first mile. A used car, on the other hand, starts with a significant advantage: The first owner has already paid off its carbon debt. Buy a decade-old Toyota Tercel, which gets a respectable 35 mpg, and the Prius will have to drive 100,000 miles to catch up.

Better yet, buy a three-cylinder, 49-horsepower 1994 Geo Metro XFi, one of the most fuel-efficient cars ever built. It gets the same average mileage as a 2008 Prius, so a new hybrid would never close the carbon gap. Sure, the XFi has no AC or airbags — but nobody said saving the planet would be comfortable, or even safe.

Read the entire article at Don’t Buy That New Prius! Test-Drive a Used Car Instead.

Carmakers carbon footprint heavier than claimed

Sunday, May 25th, 2008
Carmakers carbon footprint heavier than claimed

Auto Express study highlights emissions discrepancies

Carmakers have been accused of exaggerating their green credentials with C02 road test emissions figures consistently higher than those claimed.

Auto Express conducted “Green or Gimmick” road tests on eight vehicles, which, it said, all produced higher emissions than advertised.

The manufacturer’s official figures are based on laboratory tests conducted by the manufacturers, importers or independent test engineers, and do not always reflect driving conditions.

The Toyota Prius, the most lauded hybrid model, produced 157g/km CO2 emissions, compared to the official figure of 104 g/km.

Read the entire article at Carmakers carbon footprint heavier than claimed.

reportonbusiness.com: Road to hell is paved with public transit

Sunday, May 25th, 2008
reportonbusiness.com: Road to hell is paved with public transit Neil Reynolds

OTTAWA — The average public transit bus in the U.S. uses 4,365 British thermal units, a measure of energy, per passenger mile and emits 0.71 pounds of carbon dioxide. The average car uses 3,445 BTUs per passenger mile and emits 0.54 pounds of CO{-2}. Whether you seek to conserve energy or to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, your public policy decision here appears remarkably obvious. Get people off buses and get them into cars. The decision to do precisely this will get progressively easier. By 2020, the average car will use only 3,000 BTUs per passenger mile; by 2035, only 2,500 BTUs. By this time, the car will be - by far - the greenest option in the 21st century urban transit system.

Thus calculates Randal O’Toole, an Oregon economist with impeccable environmental credentials. Senior economist for a number of years with the Thoreau Institute (an environmental think tank in Portland) and lecturer in environmental economics at Yale and at the University of California at Berkeley, Mr. O’Toole has been described as the next Jane Jacobs, the influential contrarian environmentalist who ironically worked in more innocent times to keep cars out of North American downtowns. Author of provocative books such as The Vanishing Automobile and Other Urban Myths and The Best-Laid Plans: How Government Planning Harms Your Quality of Life, Mr. O’Toole is now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, the Washington-based libertarian think tank. He reportedly cycles to work every day.

Most public transit systems, Mr. O’Toole says in a research paper published in April, have never done the job that governments entrusted to them, which was to move large numbers of people safely to work in the morning and to move them safely back home at night. (On the basis of every billion passenger miles, he asserts, “light-rail [public transit] kills three times as many people as cars on urban freeways.”) Judged on either environmental or economic efficiency, he says, public transit systems consistently produce diminishing returns.

New York operates the most energy-efficient system in the U.S. - but only because its buses carry an average of 17 passengers, or 60 per cent more “load” than the 10.7 passengers carried by the average public transit bus nationwide. (The average public transit bus has seats for 39 people and standing room for 20.) New York keeps losing market share to cars, too. In 1985, the public transit share of passenger travel in New York was 12.7 per cent, far ahead of the No. 2 system (with a 5.2 per cent share) in Chicago. By 2005, though, the public transit share in New York had fallen to 9.6 per cent; Chicago, in the same period, had fallen to 3.7 per cent. At the lower end, Buffalo fell from a 1.2 per cent share of the passenger market to 0.6 per cent; Sacramento fell to a 0.7 per cent share from 0.9 per cent.

Read the entire article at reportonbusiness.com: Road to hell is paved with public transit.

Question Of The Day: Are Hybrids Bunk?

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008
Question Of The Day: Are Hybrids Bunk?

We’re constantly approached by people who want to know which hybrid is best. There’s a lot of excitement, still, around the concept of not only saving gas but of also having a neat toy with about 600 green stickers on it. Just today Honda announced a renewed commitment to hybrids. And while we like the idea of new toys, and of saving gas, we’ve been less than impressed with the hybrids we’ve driven, especially given the premium. Take, for instance, the Saturn Aura Hybrid, which makes a combined 27 mpg (24/32) compared to the regular four-cylinder version, which makes a combined 25 mpg (22/30). That’s not a huge difference but there’s an approximately $3,700 price difference between the two (and only a $1,300 tax credit).

We don’t blame the car companies for making them, as it is a nice way to move cars at a premium and start to inch that CAFE up to levels they were able to achieve in the 1980’s. And we don’t necessarily blame people for buying them, as we all want to do our part. But is the cost difference so great that it wouldn’t be better to just buy a Geo Metro or beater Brat and just keep up proper maintenance on a current vehicle? Are hybrids merely Band-Aids that are too small and too expensive? Or are hybrids a clever way to maintain our precious resources and reduce city emissio

Read the entire article at Question Of The Day: Are Hybrids Bunk?.

No Such Thing as a Free Lunch

Saturday, May 17th, 2008
No Such Thing as a Free Lunch

In the past few years we’ve seen brands start to adopt this strategy in an effort to engender support from smaller, more influential groups. A prime example of this is the Toyota Prius, which became the defacto “green badge of courage” for pop-culture celebrities and ultimately trickled down to consumers with that message infused in its brand. The early adoption of the Prius by Hollywood laid the groundwork for consumers who think “green” to immediately think “Prius.” Granted, Toyota released a highly fuel-efficient automobile, but without the grassroots support it garnered early on from influential consumers, the car’s success would have been entirely different. When the intended brand message falls into the right hands through unforced marketing techniques with an opportunity to interact on an authentic level, it will intrinsically lead to higher credibility within these consumer groups.

Read the entire article at No Such Thing as a Free Lunch.

domain-b.com : Toyota loses $4.3-million patent appeal before US Supreme Court

Saturday, May 17th, 2008
domain-b.com : Toyota loses $4.3-million patent appeal before US Supreme Court

Toyota may be finding it hard to cope with demand for its hybrid car Prius in the US, and may have even raised prices of its groundbreaking product, but it recently received a legal setback involving the Prius when the country’s Supreme Court upheld a lower court judgement against the company. (See: American buyers find the Toyota Prius more difficult and expensive to buy)

The court let stand a $4.3-million award against the automaker for using another company’s patented technology in gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, including the top-selling Prius.

The judges turned down an appeal filed by Toyota against the adverse ruling passed down by a jury earlier this year. Toyota had earlier unsuccessfully challenged the verdict at a federal appeals court in Washington last year.

The ruling makes Toyota liable to pay Paice LLC royalties for future vehicles it produces using the disputed technology. The appeals court told a trial judge to revisit his order that Toyota pay $25 for every Prius, Highlander and Lexus RX400h sold. The appellate panel refused to block sales of the infringing vehicles.

The disputed technology involves a microprocessor that accepts torque information from both the internal combustion engine and electric motor.

In its Supreme Court appeal, Toyota called Paice a ”patent litigation company” that was ”attempting to impose a royalty toll on the Prius and similar Toyota hybrid vehicles based on an obscure patent.”

Paice, which had applied for its patent in 1992, urged the Supreme Court not to hear the appeal. The company said the hybrid-car market ”did not take off until Toyota revamped its vehicle programme using technology that Paice patented almost 10 years earlier.”

Read the entire article at domain-b.com : Toyota loses $4.3-million patent appeal before US Supreme Court.

cbs13.com - Motorcyclist Killed In Elk Grove Crash

Saturday, May 17th, 2008
cbs13.com - Motorcyclist Killed In Elk Grove Crash

Motorcyclist Killed In Elk Grove Crash
ELK GROVE (CBS13) ― A deadly crash in Elk Grove shut down a busy roadway during the morning commute.  

The accident happened on Grant Line Road at Eagle’s Nest. 

The CHP says a Toyota Prius pulled out in front of a motorcyclist.

The driver of the Prius wasn’t hurt but the cyclist was killed.
 
Grant Line Road was closed or partially closed for several hours as the CHP investigated the accident. 

Read the entire article at cbs13.com - Motorcyclist Killed In Elk Grove Crash.

Industry News: Toyota Prius Global Cumulative Sales Pass One Million… Is That A Native American Crying?

Thursday, May 15th, 2008
Industry News: Toyota Prius Global Cumulative Sales Pass One Million… Is That A Native American Crying?

There’s no doubt the Toyota Prius is a global phenom, blazing the way for eco-conscious consumers to show the world that they really, really, really do care about the environment. And now the little-hybrid-that-could is finally passing the one million global cumulative sales mark. That means that since the Prius went on sale in 1997, the super number one best awesome automaker from the land of the rising sun’s sold as many Prii as they sold heavy duty commercial vehicles in just the 2007 sales year. If that’s not an environmental impact, we don’t know what is. We salute you…

…Toyota — thank you for helping to make it easier for people across the world to sleep at night, comforted by the soporific effect of believing they’re actually doing something, anything for the environment — and continuing the commoditization of the driving experience at the same time. Luckily, Toyota’s hoping to make it to two million Prii sold in significantly less time than it took them to sell the first million. They’re even hoping to reach a million hybrids a year by sometime in the 2010’s.

Incidentally, this past year, Toyota sold more Tundra pickups in the U.S. than Prii — to the tune of just under 200,000 of the pick-me-ups versus 181,221 of the happy hybrids. Go green!

Read the entire article at Industry News: Toyota Prius Global Cumulative Sales Pass One Million… Is That A Native American Crying?.